I'm always reading something, usually multiple books at a time.
This review is redacted. Harm to ongoing matter; grand jury; personal privacy. (Okay, not really.... But those characters Ongoing Matter, Grand Jury, and Personal Privacy are seriously underdeveloped in this book! I kid, I kid....)
I'm not giving this a star rating, as it feels kind of weird to do so. I wanted to know what the actual report contains (as opposed to the way it's been characterized), redactions allowing. The Washington Post did a good job with context and background materials. It had a good beat and I could dance to it.